Validation of Routes

Problems? Bugs found? Questions? Please post here.

Moderator: Michal Rok

Validation of Routes

Postby oldenough » Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:14 pm

I just got PFPX and have been experimenting with it trying to learn more about flight plans. I came up with the following route from EGKK to LOWI.

N418F230 DVR L9 KONAN UL607 REMBA UM624 DIK UM150 UTABA UM738 MADEB UN606 ELMEM

It passes CFMU validation in PFPX, but fails in vroute. The error message is "prof199: PITES UM150 KRH IS A CLOSED CDR 2 IN FL RANGE F245..F660" If I look up UM150 in the 03/04/14 "ROUTE RESTRICTIONS THROUGH BELGIUM & LUXEMBOURG - EB" for portion of UM150 I only find "Not available for traffic DEP EHBK, EBLG, ETNG This traffic shall file via LNO ARCKY L607 ROPUV" which does not seem to apply to my route. Are your system and PFPX using different sources for validation? Am I not understanding the Route Restrictions document? Or...?
oldenough
Premium User
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:01 pm

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby Michal Rok » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:03 am

Probably PFPX submits route for validation with different aircraft type. Is this something they let you change? If so, vroute uses b738.


Michal
User avatar
Michal Rok
Five Star Club
 
Posts: 2416
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby bankii » Sun Aug 03, 2014 3:16 pm

Hi!
My submitted route between LCLK and UUEE was rejected.
From - to: LCLK - UUEE
FL: 370 - 390
Route: RUDER UR78 ALSUS UL620 VESAR UL619 MUT UA285 SELVI UA285 SIV UW72 CRM UG901 BALUM G901 LEKPI R114 BA G247 MIMRA B145 KANON R808 TS R11 US R802 IN DR TURUG OKLIT
Since the Malaysian aircraft disaster occurred in the territory of Ukraine bypasses all AEROFLOT flight.
This information I received from the management of Aeroflot-va.

Perhaps the comment that it would have to write?

Istvan
bankii
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:29 pm

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby Michal Rok » Mon Aug 04, 2014 5:17 am

No. Please see the reason for rejection, which was given in email as "no procedures", and further explained as:

- no procedures - you created a route to/from a major airport without required SID/STAR procedures,
or you listed individual waypoints of a procedure instead of referring to it's name


In your case, you did not use any STAR procedure on the Moscow end of the route, but instead listed plenty individual waypoints that belong to a STAR.


Michal
User avatar
Michal Rok
Five Star Club
 
Posts: 2416
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby bankii » Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:09 pm

Hi Michal!

When planning a new route, it is not "all user" option to publish me.
Két választási lehetőség van csak: "Just me", vagy "Aeroflot-VA user"
I have changed my email address, but it did not change anything.
:(
bankii
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:29 pm

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby bankii » Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:18 pm

Michal Rok wrote:No. Please see the reason for rejection, which was given in email as "no procedures", and further explained as:

- no procedures - you created a route to/from a major airport without required SID/STAR procedures,
or you listed individual waypoints of a procedure instead of referring to it's name


In your case, you did not use any STAR procedure on the Moscow end of the route, but instead listed plenty individual waypoints that belong to a STAR.


Michal


Moszkvában a megközelítési eljárásban UM ponttól direct FK kell repülni, ahonnan kezdődik a tranzíció. A real Aeroflot útvonalterveiben UM és FK között szerepelnek a közbenső pontok.
Moscow to fly the approach procedure point to direct UM FK, which begins Transicion. Among the real routes of Aeroflot plans UM FK and the intermediate points, so I wrote the VATSIM route plan.
Istvan
bankii
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:29 pm

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby bankii » Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:29 pm

Michal Rok wrote:No. Please see the reason for rejection, which was given in email as "no procedures", and further explained as:

- no procedures - you created a route to/from a major airport without required SID/STAR procedures,
or you listed individual waypoints of a procedure instead of referring to it's name


In your case, you did not use any STAR procedure on the Moscow end of the route, but instead listed plenty individual waypoints that belong to a STAR.


Michal


Next plane for Aeroflot:
№ рейса: AFL2337
Аэропорт отправления: Echterdingen Stuttgart ( DE EDDS) время UTC 1220
Аэропорт прибытия: Sheremetyevo Moscow ( RU UUEE) время UTC 1525
Время в пути: 03:05
Эшелон полета: 35000
Маршрут: OKIBA ROLSO N851 RIMKI Z99 LOHRE UN746 ESOBU UN858 SUI N858 OGUTA R800 FK ATRUN LEMRU UM
Ремарки: RMK/CALLSIGN AEROFLOT RTE/AFL2337
bankii
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:29 pm

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby Michal Rok » Thu Oct 23, 2014 4:30 am

And?


Michal
User avatar
Michal Rok
Five Star Club
 
Posts: 2416
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby bankii » Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:57 am

Michal Rok wrote:And?


Michal


I think it was taken from the "All user" due to my right at the Moscow route plans.

Istvan
:(
bankii
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:29 pm

Re: Validation of Routes

Postby Sharky » Sun Feb 15, 2015 2:02 pm

Hi :)

for routes within/inbound/outbound Europe I get following validation error message:
Example EDDH - EDDF

ERRORS AT FL = 260:
(FPL-LOT001-IS -B738/M-SDRWY/S -EDDH0850 -N0430F260 AMLUH UM852 BIBNU DCT RIMET T157 KERAX -EDDF0100 -PBN/B4) EFPM234: ESTIMATED OFF BLOCK DATE AND TIME IS NOT WITHIN ACCEPTABLE RANGE: 151321 TO 201351

The departure time 08:50z is not valid for current day. Routes within America or Asia validate fine.


Greetings
Sharky
Five Star Club
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 1:36 pm


Return to vroute info product support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron